LimsPulse
APIs & raw materials · Powder (API or excipient)

Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction

Measures the volume-based size distribution of a powder by laser diffraction and reports D10, D50, D90 and span against the specification.

  • Laser diffraction (wet or dry dispersion)
  • Laser diffraction PSA
  • Analytical balance
  • Optical microscope

Reference: Typical approach based on USP <429> / Ph. Eur. 2.9.31 and ISO 13320. Always follow your approved specification and validated method.

PRINCIPLE

Why this method works

The dispersed powder scatters laser light. Large particles scatter at small angles and small particles at wide angles. The instrument fits the measured scattering pattern with Mie (or Fraunhofer) theory to give the volume distribution of equivalent spheres. D10, D50 and D90 are read from the cumulative distribution and span describes its width.

Instruments used

MATERIALS

Reagents & standards

ReagentGrade / specification
Dispersant (wet method)Liquid in which the sample does not dissolve, e.g. light liquid paraffin or a saturated aqueous solution, as per the validated method
Surfactant (if required)e.g. a small amount of lecithin or polysorbate to help wetting
Compressed air (dry method)Clean, dry and oil-free
SAMPLE PREPARATION

Preparing the sample

  1. 01

    Sample

    Take a representative sample with a riffler or by careful mixing.

  2. 02

    Pre-disperse

    For wet methods, wet the powder with a little dispersant to form a paste.

  3. 03

    Add to unit

    Add until obscuration is in the method range.

  4. 04

    Disperse

    Apply the stated sonication / stirring or air pressure for the set time.

  5. 05

    Measure

    Measure in replicate and check the trend.

  6. 06

    Check visually

    Look at the sample under a microscope if agglomerates are suspected.

Procedure

  1. 1Mix the container contents gently and sub-sample with a rotary riffler or spinning splitter where possible.
  2. 2Wet method: weigh about the amount stated (often 50–200 mg), wet it with a few drops of dispersant containing surfactant and mix to a smooth paste.
  3. 3Measure the background with clean dispersant.
  4. 4Add the sample until the obscuration is in range (e.g. 10–20% for wet methods; method-specific).
  5. 5Sonicate or stir for the validated time to break agglomerates without breaking primary particles.
  6. 6Measure three times and record D10, D50 and D90.
  7. 7Prepare and measure further sub-samples if the method requires (commonly two or three preparations).

Standard preparation

  1. 1No calibration standard is used in each run; instrument performance is shown by the periodic certified reference material check.

Notes for analysts

  • Laser diffraction reports equivalent sphere sizes; needle-shaped crystals can give misleading results, so confirm shape by microscopy.
  • Results from wet and dry methods, or from different instrument models, may differ; do not compare them directly without a bridging study.
  • Span is a width measure; a span near 1 is a narrow distribution and above 2 a broad one.
TEST CONDITIONS

Method parameters (typical)

Optical modelMie theory with the validated refractive index for the sample and dispersant (or Fraunhofer if justified)
DispersionWet (stirred tank, stated stirrer speed and sonication) or dry (stated air pressure and feed rate)
Obscuration rangeAs validated, e.g. 10–20% (wet) or 0.5–6% (dry)
Measurement timee.g. 10 s background and 10 s sample per measurement
ReplicatesThree measurements per preparation
Results reportedD10, D50, D90 (µm); span
BEFORE YOU REPORT

System suitability & sequence

ParameterLimit
CRM checkWithin its calibration due date
BackgroundLow and stable, within the instrument's limit
Repeatability of replicatesTypically %RSD ≤ 3% for D50 and ≤ 5% for D10 and D90 (wider limits may apply below 10 µm)

Typical sequence

  1. 1Background measurement
  2. 2Preparation 1: three measurements
  3. 3Preparation 2: three measurements (if required)
  4. 4Clean unit and re-check background
CALCULATION

Calculation with a worked example

Span = (D90 − D10) ÷ D50

Where

D10
Size below which 10% of the sample volume lies (µm)
D50
Volume median diameter: 50% of volume is below this size (µm)
D90
Size below which 90% of the sample volume lies (µm)

Given

D10
12.4 µm
D50
45.6 µm
D90
118.2 µm

Working

  1. D90 − D10 = 118.2 − 12.4 = 105.8 µm
  2. Span = 105.8 ÷ 45.6 = 2.32

D10 = 12.4 µm, D50 = 45.6 µm, D90 = 118.2 µm, span = 2.32. Compare each with the specification (e.g. D90 not more than a stated limit).

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

What result passes

  • As per the material specification, usually limits on D50 and D90 (and sometimes D10), e.g. 'D90 not more than 150 µm'. Limits are product-specific.
METHOD VALIDATION

Validation parameters (ICH Q2(R2))

ParameterTypical requirement
Specificity / dispersionDispersant does not dissolve the sample; sonication or pressure titration shows agglomerates are broken without milling primary particles
PrecisionRepeatability and intermediate precision, typically %RSD ≤ 3% at D50 and ≤ 5% at D10 and D90
RobustnessSmall changes to obscuration, stirrer speed, sonication time and refractive index
SamplingSub-sampling technique shown to give representative results
In LimsPulse · Sample Management

Run this method in LimsPulse: specifications and STPs under version control, results calculated and checked against limits, and a signed Certificate of Analysis.

See how